INDEPENDENSI MEDIA TEMPO DAN PENGARUH EKONOMI POLITIK DALAM PRAKTIK STRUKTURASI

Authors

  • Elik Susanto Paramadina Graduate-School of Communication, Universitas Paramadina Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32509/pustakom.v4i1.1314

Keywords:

tempo media independence, political economic influence, structuralization practices

Abstract

This research focused on how Tempo editors apply the principles of independence, maintain credibility, and maintain the integrity of journalists as a media business strategy in the digital age. It is no secret that in the media newsroom there are often conflicts, namely the pull between business interests and editorial attitudes. The opposition heats up as newsroom authorities deal with marketing, advertising sections, business development sections, as well as shareholders in news products. The purpose of this study is to see how the negotiation process and compromise the interests of it. At the end of the day, there are those who win and lose. Research using qualitative method with descriptive approach. In describing the findings, researchers will use inductive theory as a tool of hypothesis, observation, and analysis of Tempo practices applying independence in the influence of political economy structure. The researchers' findings state that in maintaining integrity as an effort to uphold the independence of Tempo is not easy to intervene by anyone when making a report on journalistic products.

References

Adila, I. & Prasetya, A.B. (2020). Ekonomi Politik Komunikasi, Sebuah Realitas Industri Media di Indonesia. Malang, UB Press.

Aminah, S. & Roikan. (2019). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Kualilatif Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Atmakusumah. (2018). Pers Ideal Untuk Masa Demokrasi. Jakarta: LPDS

Bungin, B. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Aktualisasi Metodologis ke Arah Ragam Varian Kontemporer. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Giddens, A. (1990). Central Problems in Social Theory, London: Macmillan Education Ltd H.

KBBI Daring. Kemdikbud.go.id

Kepemilikan saham PT Tempo Inti Media, Tbk. (2020, 30 April). Diakses dari situs https://korporat.tempo.co.id

Kovack, B. & Rosenstiel, T. (2003). Sembilan Elemen Jurnalisme, Terjemahan: Pareanom. Jakarta: Yayasan Pantau.

Kovack, B. & Rosenstiel, T. (2012). Blur, Bagaimana Mengetahui Kebenaran di Era Banjir Informasi. Terjemahan: Yayasan Pantau. Jakarta: Dewan Pers.

LPDS. (2019). Pedoman Uji Kompetensi Wartawan, Penerapan Standar Kompetensi Wartawan. Jakarta: Lembaga Pers Dr. Soetomo Yayasan Pendidikan Multimedia Adinegoro.

McQuail. D. (2018). Teori Komunikasi Mssa, Terjemahan: Iva Izzati. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Mosco, V. (2006). The Political Economy of Communication, London: Sage Publication.

Musfialdy. (2019). Independensi Media: Pro-Kontra Obyektivitas dan Netralitas Pemberitaan Media. Jurkom. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.24329/jurkom.v2i1.50.

Steele, J. (2007). Wars Within, Pergulatan Tempo, Majalah Berita Sejak Zaman Orde Baru. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.

Subandi, Z.E. & Sadono, T.P. (2018). Komodifikasi, Spasialisasi, dan Strukturasi dalam Media Baru di Indonesia. Jurnal Universitas Bunda Mulia. http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/ncci.v0i0.1297.

Pratopo, W.M. (2017). Komodifikasi Wartawan di Era Konvergensi: Studi Kasus Tempo. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 2615-2894. https://doi/org/10.7454/jki.v6i2.8715.

Putra, A.M., Nugroho, H. & Budiawan. (2016). Ekonomi Politik Pemberitaan Konflik Persepakbolaan Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 13 (2). https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v13i2.673.

Sudibyo, A. (2000). Absennya Pendekatan Ekonomi Politik Untuk Setudi Media. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Vol. 4-2, 115-134. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. London: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK.

Yin. K. R. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3th Editon. America SAGE Publication

Downloads

Published

2021-04-15